It is a sad, sad, day, when we have to get information from Newsday, instead of announcing it at mass on Sunday.
I had predicted from the start, that Msgr Lisante was sent to OLLMP precisely for this reason, to diminish the school enrollment, inorder to shut down the school, and eventually the Parish. In my post of 2008, it was evident that Msgr Lisante was not sent to OLLMP to build it up, as the parish was already vibrant under Pastor Robert Mason. Too many Liberal parents of the School wanted to turn the Church School into something resembling the public schools, in other words, remove the catholic teaching and Catholic Observances. Why else would Msgr Lisante
cancel the Sunday Children's mass, or the regular practice of hearing confessions in the school for first Fridays, or remove the confessions on late Saturday night for those that worked on Saturdays. How about bringing into the parish a priest without faculties, which was an 8 year thing started by him from St Thomas parish, where he was the Pastor, and the hiring of another Music Director, when the school enrollment was already so low? Does he have any idea of what the name and duties of a Pastor are supposed to be? I doubt it, as we are lucky if he shows up one day a week for the Sunday "Performance" that he does. Do you think that because he was too busy with his TV Career to attend to his "Pastoral duties", that the School and the parish fell apart? He went through the motions of building up the School, waisting so much money on equipment and renovations, when it could have been used for the schools needs,
instead of squandered as a false show of trying to improve the school.
How about all of the money waisted on his furnishings, and extra help he imported to take the place of him being there to handle the daily problems and chores?
What happened to the $2.5 million that was left over to the parish by the previous Pastor? Other than the steadfast Conservatives in the parish, no one bothered to ask the questions that needed to be asked, if even on a business point of view. And yet, the claim that he has been reporting to
meet the parish needs by the of money he claims to collect every week.
According to his financial report in the Sunday Bulletin, he is collecting from the parishioners over $17,000 every week. What would have been received if he had not chased the good parishioners away because
of his anger over having Mathew Blockly removed.The steadfast contributors to the parish gave not just monetarily, but with the volunteers that worked around the parish. If this were a company, the parishioners
would have the rights to challenge the closing of the school, and the mishandling of money, and squandering of money by the Pastor.
My heart is torn apart, as the Bishop and Pastor of OLLMP have caused this to happen. Why couldn't the Bishop use some of his Millions of Dollars collected over the many years, to save the schools? Why is it expedient for the public schools to take money from so many sources to save the young minds in schools, and our Bishop can not find any excess money to save two small schools? You can not chase away the
contributors from the church, and expect it to keep thriving. I know where this action is heading and is why that gifted saint stated "The floor of Hell is paved with the skulls of Bishops", and I would add, "and the walls are lined with the skulls of the Pastors and Monsignors that follow them".
You Liberals have inherited what you have sown, and are now reaping the fruits of rotten seeds. Yes I know , you will say, we'll just go to another school, or Parish.
You should have done that earlier, and left the thriving conservative parish, who were doing fine over the 32 years that our former Pastor took care of the parish. Just like the foolish Liberals that had voted
in the President, that is destroying our country, so to ,your voices were not added to the conservatives that opposed the attacks by the new Pastor, and aided by the Bishop. Talk about calumnious actions, I wonder how their sins will be washed away? GOD have mercy on us all. Because of the inactivity of parishioners all around the world, the Devil and his helpers are now attacking our Pope Benedict XVI.
Our only answer is with prayer, but we still must act, and with the help of our GOD, Father, Son, and the Holy Spirit, truth and our trust in our Lord, will save us,and in the end, GOD will triumph.
Yours in Jesus,
Itzik Janowitz
Friday, April 9, 2010
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Spoken like one that has been Betrayed
He’s Done Everything Wrong
by Mort Zuckerman
| Obama punted on the economy and reversed the fortunes of the Democrats in 365 days.
He’s misjudged the character of the country in his whole approach. There’s the saying, “It’s the economy, stupid.” He didn’t get it. He was determined somehow or other to adopt a whole new agenda. He didn’t address the main issue.
This health-care plan is going to be a fiscal disaster for the country. Most of the country wanted to deal with costs, not expansion of coverage. This is going to raise costs dramatically.
In the campaign, he said he would change politics as usual. He did change them. It’s now worse than it was. I’ve now seen the kind of buying off of politicians that I’ve never seen before. It’s politically corrupt and it’s starting at the top. It’s revolting.
Five states got deals on health care—one of them was Harry Reid’s. It is disgusting, just disgusting. I’ve never seen anything like it. The unions just got them to drop the tax on Cadillac plans in the health-care bill. It was pure union politics. They just went along with it. It’s a bizarre form of political corruption. It’s bribery. I suppose they could say, that’s the system. He was supposed to change it or try to change it.
Even that is not the worst part. He could have said, “I know. I promised these things, but let me try to do them one at a time.” You want to deal with health care? Fine. Issue No. 1 with health care was the cost. You know I think it was 37 percent or 33 who were worried about coverage. Fine, I wrote an editorial to this effect. Focus on cost-containment first. But he’s trying to boil the ocean, trying to do too much. This is not leadership.
• More Daily Beast opinion on Obama’s first year Obama’s ability to connect with voters is what launched him. But what has surprised me is how he has failed to connect with the voters since he’s been in office. He’s had so much overexposure. You have to be selective. He was doing five Sunday shows. How many press conferences? And now people stop listening to him. The fact is he had 49.5 million listeners to first speech on the economy. On Medicare, he had 24 million. He’s lost his audience. He has not rallied public opinion. He has plunged in the polls more than any other political figure since we’ve been using polls. He’s done everything wrong. Well, not everything, but the major things.
I don’t consider it a triumph. I consider it a disaster.
One business leader said to me, “In the Clinton administration, the policy people were at the center, and the political people were on the sideline. In the Obama administration, the political people are at the center, and the policy people are on the sidelines.”
I’m very disappointed. We endorsed him. I voted for him. I supported him publicly and privately.
I hope there are changes. I think he’s already laid in huge problems for the country. The fiscal program was a disaster. You have to get the money as quickly as possible into the economy. They didn’t do that. By end of the first year, only one-third of the money was spent. Why is that?
He should have jammed a stimulus plan into Congress and said, “This is it. No changes. Don’t give me that bullshit. We have a national emergency.” Instead they turned it over to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi who can run circles around him.
It’s very sad. It’s really sad.
He’s improved America’s image in the world. He absolutely did. But you have to translate that into something. Let me tell you what a major leader said to me recently. “We are convinced,” he said, “that he is not strong enough to confront his enemy. We are concerned,” he said “that he is not strong to support his friends.”
The political leadership of the world is very, very dismayed. He better turn it around. The Democrats are going to get killed in this election. Jesus, looks what’s happening in Massachusetts.
It’s really interesting because he had brilliant, brilliant political instincts during the campaign. I don’t know what has happened to them. His appointments present somebody who has a lot to learn about how government works. He better get some very talented businesspeople who know how to implement things. It’s unbelievable. Everybody says so. You can’t believe how dismayed people are. That’s why he’s plunging in the polls.
I can’t predict things two years from now, but if he continues on the downward spiral he is on, he won’t be reelected. In the meantime, the Democrats have recreated the Republican Party. And when I say Democrats, I mean the Obama administration. In the generic vote, the Democrats were ahead something like 52 to 30. They are now behind the Republicans 48 to 44 in the last poll. Nobody has ever seen anything that dramatic.
Mortimer B. Zuckerman is chairman and editor in chief of U.S. News & World Report and publisher of the New York Daily News. He is also the co-founder and chairman of Boston Properties Inc. He is a trustee of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Washington Institute for Near East Studies, and the International Institute of Strategic Studies
by Mort Zuckerman
| Obama punted on the economy and reversed the fortunes of the Democrats in 365 days.
He’s misjudged the character of the country in his whole approach. There’s the saying, “It’s the economy, stupid.” He didn’t get it. He was determined somehow or other to adopt a whole new agenda. He didn’t address the main issue.
This health-care plan is going to be a fiscal disaster for the country. Most of the country wanted to deal with costs, not expansion of coverage. This is going to raise costs dramatically.
In the campaign, he said he would change politics as usual. He did change them. It’s now worse than it was. I’ve now seen the kind of buying off of politicians that I’ve never seen before. It’s politically corrupt and it’s starting at the top. It’s revolting.
Five states got deals on health care—one of them was Harry Reid’s. It is disgusting, just disgusting. I’ve never seen anything like it. The unions just got them to drop the tax on Cadillac plans in the health-care bill. It was pure union politics. They just went along with it. It’s a bizarre form of political corruption. It’s bribery. I suppose they could say, that’s the system. He was supposed to change it or try to change it.
Even that is not the worst part. He could have said, “I know. I promised these things, but let me try to do them one at a time.” You want to deal with health care? Fine. Issue No. 1 with health care was the cost. You know I think it was 37 percent or 33 who were worried about coverage. Fine, I wrote an editorial to this effect. Focus on cost-containment first. But he’s trying to boil the ocean, trying to do too much. This is not leadership.
• More Daily Beast opinion on Obama’s first year Obama’s ability to connect with voters is what launched him. But what has surprised me is how he has failed to connect with the voters since he’s been in office. He’s had so much overexposure. You have to be selective. He was doing five Sunday shows. How many press conferences? And now people stop listening to him. The fact is he had 49.5 million listeners to first speech on the economy. On Medicare, he had 24 million. He’s lost his audience. He has not rallied public opinion. He has plunged in the polls more than any other political figure since we’ve been using polls. He’s done everything wrong. Well, not everything, but the major things.
I don’t consider it a triumph. I consider it a disaster.
One business leader said to me, “In the Clinton administration, the policy people were at the center, and the political people were on the sideline. In the Obama administration, the political people are at the center, and the policy people are on the sidelines.”
I’m very disappointed. We endorsed him. I voted for him. I supported him publicly and privately.
I hope there are changes. I think he’s already laid in huge problems for the country. The fiscal program was a disaster. You have to get the money as quickly as possible into the economy. They didn’t do that. By end of the first year, only one-third of the money was spent. Why is that?
He should have jammed a stimulus plan into Congress and said, “This is it. No changes. Don’t give me that bullshit. We have a national emergency.” Instead they turned it over to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi who can run circles around him.
It’s very sad. It’s really sad.
He’s improved America’s image in the world. He absolutely did. But you have to translate that into something. Let me tell you what a major leader said to me recently. “We are convinced,” he said, “that he is not strong enough to confront his enemy. We are concerned,” he said “that he is not strong to support his friends.”
The political leadership of the world is very, very dismayed. He better turn it around. The Democrats are going to get killed in this election. Jesus, looks what’s happening in Massachusetts.
It’s really interesting because he had brilliant, brilliant political instincts during the campaign. I don’t know what has happened to them. His appointments present somebody who has a lot to learn about how government works. He better get some very talented businesspeople who know how to implement things. It’s unbelievable. Everybody says so. You can’t believe how dismayed people are. That’s why he’s plunging in the polls.
I can’t predict things two years from now, but if he continues on the downward spiral he is on, he won’t be reelected. In the meantime, the Democrats have recreated the Republican Party. And when I say Democrats, I mean the Obama administration. In the generic vote, the Democrats were ahead something like 52 to 30. They are now behind the Republicans 48 to 44 in the last poll. Nobody has ever seen anything that dramatic.
Mortimer B. Zuckerman is chairman and editor in chief of U.S. News & World Report and publisher of the New York Daily News. He is also the co-founder and chairman of Boston Properties Inc. He is a trustee of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Washington Institute for Near East Studies, and the International Institute of Strategic Studies
What can you expect from a President that doesn't salute during the national anthem
The transformation of America taking place before our very eyes at a dizzying pace
The four-phase transformation of America behind Obama’s wildly racing clock
By Marion Valentine Wednesday, April 7, 2010
The Obama Clock is racing ahead with the speed of light. On Monday, word went out to the world that the US would not use the nuclear option—even in self defense. Today comes the news that the White House will expunge the term “Islamic radicalism” from the lexicon of international terrorism.
The Free World as we know it has already become an upsidedown one, where right is wrong and wrong is right. Marxists in office are creating chaos and blaming the chaos on those who dissent against them.
But while the hands on the Obama clock spin crazily around the clock face, it is the blueprint or pattern behind it that tells us the real time, the truth and reality of what is happening.
The transformation of America taking place before our very eyes at a dizzying pace comes from phases, based on a formula to take America to its end.
Drawing on my experience as an Intelligence/Cryptologist for the U.S. Navy, here is where we are and where we are headed in the Obama Clock. By following these phases you can actually predict the next move of the enemy.
Phase One:
This phase which took decades to complete happened in the days when our grandfathers were out in the fields farming the land, raising their families, congregating in church on Sundays and paying their taxes.
Ref: The Communist goals as duly entered in the Congressional Record, June, 1963
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
The Bilderberg Group
George Soros and Members of the Democracy Alliance.
The Gamiliel Foundation
Selecting and getting elected members of Congress: (sleepers, who would hide their true motives, and just slowly push in baby steps towards Socialism until all other parts of plan were in place) Those members of Congress; Pelosi, Waxman, Rangel, Waters, Lee, Reid,Dodd, Boxer, Schumer, Durbin, and others are puppets, or the “useful idiots” of the above named groups,
The groups listed above, and others, manipulated financial and futures markets, energy supplies and prices, world currencies, and world conflicts (military industrial complex) to maximize the concentration of wealth into the hands of a few.
Selecting and tutoring a presidential contender, creating a “crisis” to ensure the outcome of the election.
Phase Two:
Now In progress
Nationalizing all aspects of the American economy.
Creating and mobilizing a private army
Discredit and intimidate dissenters
Create a crisis in order to declare a national emergency and martial law.
Create violent civic unrest and blame on dissenters.
Phase Three:
Eliminate dissenters, suspend the constitution, the Judiciary, and do away with Elections
Presidential term limits.
Form the American Union, including N and S America, Canada and Mexico,
Join with the EU
Phase Four:
Use economic and military pressure to force Asian and African countries to join the union.
Exploit all natural resources (Obama’s 11 million acre land grab which covers most of the oil reserves in the U.S.)
Flood the market with cheap energy to force Muslim nations whose economy is dependent on Oil exports to join the Union.
Create a Global Union of Socialist Nation States controlled by the UN
This is what I firmly believe will happen, taking all the world wide happenings, not as separate events, but each as a part of the larger event.
Hopefully Americans will wake up and not allow this to happen.
(I can recall seeing our anti-American president standing next to Hillary Clinton and refusing to raise his hand over his heart while the national
anthem was being played and Hillary did. I guess it is true, the American voters are Deaf Dumb and
Blind.)
The four-phase transformation of America behind Obama’s wildly racing clock
By Marion Valentine Wednesday, April 7, 2010
The Obama Clock is racing ahead with the speed of light. On Monday, word went out to the world that the US would not use the nuclear option—even in self defense. Today comes the news that the White House will expunge the term “Islamic radicalism” from the lexicon of international terrorism.
The Free World as we know it has already become an upsidedown one, where right is wrong and wrong is right. Marxists in office are creating chaos and blaming the chaos on those who dissent against them.
But while the hands on the Obama clock spin crazily around the clock face, it is the blueprint or pattern behind it that tells us the real time, the truth and reality of what is happening.
The transformation of America taking place before our very eyes at a dizzying pace comes from phases, based on a formula to take America to its end.
Drawing on my experience as an Intelligence/Cryptologist for the U.S. Navy, here is where we are and where we are headed in the Obama Clock. By following these phases you can actually predict the next move of the enemy.
Phase One:
This phase which took decades to complete happened in the days when our grandfathers were out in the fields farming the land, raising their families, congregating in church on Sundays and paying their taxes.
Ref: The Communist goals as duly entered in the Congressional Record, June, 1963
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
The Bilderberg Group
George Soros and Members of the Democracy Alliance.
The Gamiliel Foundation
Selecting and getting elected members of Congress: (sleepers, who would hide their true motives, and just slowly push in baby steps towards Socialism until all other parts of plan were in place) Those members of Congress; Pelosi, Waxman, Rangel, Waters, Lee, Reid,Dodd, Boxer, Schumer, Durbin, and others are puppets, or the “useful idiots” of the above named groups,
The groups listed above, and others, manipulated financial and futures markets, energy supplies and prices, world currencies, and world conflicts (military industrial complex) to maximize the concentration of wealth into the hands of a few.
Selecting and tutoring a presidential contender, creating a “crisis” to ensure the outcome of the election.
Phase Two:
Now In progress
Nationalizing all aspects of the American economy.
Creating and mobilizing a private army
Discredit and intimidate dissenters
Create a crisis in order to declare a national emergency and martial law.
Create violent civic unrest and blame on dissenters.
Phase Three:
Eliminate dissenters, suspend the constitution, the Judiciary, and do away with Elections
Presidential term limits.
Form the American Union, including N and S America, Canada and Mexico,
Join with the EU
Phase Four:
Use economic and military pressure to force Asian and African countries to join the union.
Exploit all natural resources (Obama’s 11 million acre land grab which covers most of the oil reserves in the U.S.)
Flood the market with cheap energy to force Muslim nations whose economy is dependent on Oil exports to join the Union.
Create a Global Union of Socialist Nation States controlled by the UN
This is what I firmly believe will happen, taking all the world wide happenings, not as separate events, but each as a part of the larger event.
Hopefully Americans will wake up and not allow this to happen.
(I can recall seeing our anti-American president standing next to Hillary Clinton and refusing to raise his hand over his heart while the national
anthem was being played and Hillary did. I guess it is true, the American voters are Deaf Dumb and
Blind.)
Monday, April 5, 2010
Obama removes Jesus from Iwo Jima speech.
The Church Of Barack
Easter without Christ, obama-style
Helmet tip to Former Altar Boy
Leave it to DingleBarry to conveniently omit Jesus Christ from his alleged Easter Message. Here's some of the article from To Renew America;
Obama Removes Jesus from Easter Message
Vince Haley
President Obama literally edited Christ out of his “holiday greeting” today when he excerpted a sermon given by a military chaplain on Iwo Jima on Easter Sunday 1945.
Below is the relevant paragraph from Obama’s holiday greeting today:
The rites of Passover, and the traditions of Easter, have been marked by people in every corner of the planet for thousands of years. They have been marked in times of peace, in times of upheaval, in times of war.
One such war-time service was held on the black sands of Iwo Jima more than sixty years ago. There, in the wake of some of the fiercest fighting of World War II, a chaplain rose to deliver an Easter sermon, consecrating the memory, he said “of American dead – Catholic, Protestant, Jew. Together,” he said, “they huddled in foxholes or crouched in the bloody sands…Together they practiced virtue, patriotism, love of country, love of you and of me.” The chaplain continued, “The heritage they have left us, the vision of a new world, [was] made possible by the common bond that united them…their only hope that this unity will endure.”
Their only hope that this unity will endure.
Now read below the same paragraph again, but this time note the additional bolded language that comes from the original audio of the 1945 sermon and its context, but which President Obama decided not to include:
Easter without Christ, obama-style
Helmet tip to Former Altar Boy
Leave it to DingleBarry to conveniently omit Jesus Christ from his alleged Easter Message. Here's some of the article from To Renew America;
Obama Removes Jesus from Easter Message
Vince Haley
President Obama literally edited Christ out of his “holiday greeting” today when he excerpted a sermon given by a military chaplain on Iwo Jima on Easter Sunday 1945.
Below is the relevant paragraph from Obama’s holiday greeting today:
The rites of Passover, and the traditions of Easter, have been marked by people in every corner of the planet for thousands of years. They have been marked in times of peace, in times of upheaval, in times of war.
One such war-time service was held on the black sands of Iwo Jima more than sixty years ago. There, in the wake of some of the fiercest fighting of World War II, a chaplain rose to deliver an Easter sermon, consecrating the memory, he said “of American dead – Catholic, Protestant, Jew. Together,” he said, “they huddled in foxholes or crouched in the bloody sands…Together they practiced virtue, patriotism, love of country, love of you and of me.” The chaplain continued, “The heritage they have left us, the vision of a new world, [was] made possible by the common bond that united them…their only hope that this unity will endure.”
Their only hope that this unity will endure.
Now read below the same paragraph again, but this time note the additional bolded language that comes from the original audio of the 1945 sermon and its context, but which President Obama decided not to include:
If at first you don't succeed Barry, Lie, Lie, and Lie again.
Obama gave us taunts, insults and attacks from the bully pulpit
By Jayme Evans Sunday, April 4, 2010
“Part of the undertow in the coming election is going to be, uh, President Obama’s leadership. And the Republicans would make a case, and a lot of Independents will buy this argument, listen, he just hasn’t been, I mean look at the health care bill, his number one priority and it took him forever to get it through and he had to compromise it to death and a version of… listen, he’s a nice person and he’s very articulate, this is what’s going to be used against him, but he couldn’t sell watermelons if you gave him a state trooper and he lied down in traffic.” - 3/7/10 - Disgraced ex-journalist Dan Rather speculating on what a failure to pass health care legislation would mean for Obama.
In the wake of their arguably “successful” and overwhelmingly unpopular government takeover of the US health care system, which also succeeded in hopelessly dividing the entire country, you’d think that if Barack Obama and Democrats were interested at all in governing, rather than enslaving us through a Chicago-style dictatorship, they’d tone down their rhetorical attacks just a bit. But, recent events indicate they have no intention of doing so and that the attacks are increasing.
Since his campaign, Democrats have tried on several occasions to label opposition to specific Obama policy decisions as the unfortunate by-product of vehement, deep-seated racism. These baseless accusations have continued to surface every so often, whenever Democrats feel vulnerable. And, as the debate over health care wore on, it became increasingly clear that, although they may win the policy fight, Democrats already lost the debate long ago. So, the racist attacks began.
First, they manufactured that pathetic spectacle for the cameras where black House Democrats marched arm-in-arm with Nancy Pelosi to the capitol, through jeering crowds, trying to equate protesters of her trillion-dollar lies and chicanery with the turbulence of the African-American struggle for equality back in the 1960s.
Then there was the incident where Rep. Emanuel Cleaver was allegedly spat on. Although dissenting opinions abound, the video that I saw never showed him immediately wipe someone else’s saliva from his face, glasses or anywhere else, as one instinctively would if they were spat upon intentionally. What I saw was the Congressman react by ducking his head when an angry protester cupped his hands and yelled at the top of his lungs mere inches from his ear as well as a female police officer and then, when he realized a camera was rolling, pretend to wipe something off of his face.
Although his election was a numerical impossibility without white, independent voters, Slanderer-In-Chief Barack Obama is unfortunately not above the fray, having recently engaged in a bit of race-baiting himself. Cognizant of how angry the electorate was after they were forced to accept his un-Constitutional expansion of federal power, he embarked on a slew of campaign stops that were ostensibly designed to convince skeptical Americans of the merits of ObamaCare. What we got instead were more taunts, insults and attacks from the bully pulpit, with Obama daring opponents to repeal the legislation and mocking those who believe that he pledged to uphold the US Constitution instead of wiping with it after Chris Matthews is done kissing his behind.
Matthews continues to attribute racist motives to Constitutional conservatives who oppose Obama, yet he couldn’t even feign surprise during his March 7, 2010 show when disgraced ex-journalist Dan Rather opined that Obama"Couldn’t sell watermelons if you gave him a state trooper and he lied(sic) down in traffic.”
Mr. Obama has also given interviews of late, characterizing those who oppose his policies as racist, conspiracy nuts who actually oppose him because of his skin color (which I’d like to remind you is half-white) or because (according to Obama) he wasn’t born in this country, a blatant misrepresentation of the argument made by so-called “birthers” about his eligibility. As one of those so-called birthers, I question, not whether Barack Obama was born in the US, but whether his birth, wherever that was, qualifies him as a “natural-born” US citizen, as only “natural born” citizens qualify to be president.
Not content with a few cheap shots, Obama and Democrats have now embarked on a smear campaign the likes of which we’ve never seen. Anyone who questions Obama’s motives or agenda, anyone who is associated with the Tea Party movement and anyone who disapproves of his installation of a socialist dictatorship with its “carrot and stick” approach is to be labeled as a violent racist.
Democrats seem to be operating on the premise that if you can’t silence the message, just shoot the messenger. Unfortunately for them, there are simply too many Paul Reveres this time. Too many voices to silence and too many Americans who still believe in their Constitution to allow this garbage to continue. I’m not shutting up, I’m not intimidated by a deaf congress, executive thuggery, or baseless charges of racism. I can articulate specific socialist policy decisions I disagree with and which provisions of our founding documents these policies violate. And my voice, along with millions of others, will be heard louder than ever in November. Until then, if you have any concrete evidence that my opposition to Obama’s objectionable policies is based on anything other than his Marxism, then put it out there for the world to see. Otherwise, I suggest you shut your big Fat Mouth.
By Jayme Evans Sunday, April 4, 2010
“Part of the undertow in the coming election is going to be, uh, President Obama’s leadership. And the Republicans would make a case, and a lot of Independents will buy this argument, listen, he just hasn’t been, I mean look at the health care bill, his number one priority and it took him forever to get it through and he had to compromise it to death and a version of… listen, he’s a nice person and he’s very articulate, this is what’s going to be used against him, but he couldn’t sell watermelons if you gave him a state trooper and he lied down in traffic.” - 3/7/10 - Disgraced ex-journalist Dan Rather speculating on what a failure to pass health care legislation would mean for Obama.
In the wake of their arguably “successful” and overwhelmingly unpopular government takeover of the US health care system, which also succeeded in hopelessly dividing the entire country, you’d think that if Barack Obama and Democrats were interested at all in governing, rather than enslaving us through a Chicago-style dictatorship, they’d tone down their rhetorical attacks just a bit. But, recent events indicate they have no intention of doing so and that the attacks are increasing.
Since his campaign, Democrats have tried on several occasions to label opposition to specific Obama policy decisions as the unfortunate by-product of vehement, deep-seated racism. These baseless accusations have continued to surface every so often, whenever Democrats feel vulnerable. And, as the debate over health care wore on, it became increasingly clear that, although they may win the policy fight, Democrats already lost the debate long ago. So, the racist attacks began.
First, they manufactured that pathetic spectacle for the cameras where black House Democrats marched arm-in-arm with Nancy Pelosi to the capitol, through jeering crowds, trying to equate protesters of her trillion-dollar lies and chicanery with the turbulence of the African-American struggle for equality back in the 1960s.
Then there was the incident where Rep. Emanuel Cleaver was allegedly spat on. Although dissenting opinions abound, the video that I saw never showed him immediately wipe someone else’s saliva from his face, glasses or anywhere else, as one instinctively would if they were spat upon intentionally. What I saw was the Congressman react by ducking his head when an angry protester cupped his hands and yelled at the top of his lungs mere inches from his ear as well as a female police officer and then, when he realized a camera was rolling, pretend to wipe something off of his face.
Although his election was a numerical impossibility without white, independent voters, Slanderer-In-Chief Barack Obama is unfortunately not above the fray, having recently engaged in a bit of race-baiting himself. Cognizant of how angry the electorate was after they were forced to accept his un-Constitutional expansion of federal power, he embarked on a slew of campaign stops that were ostensibly designed to convince skeptical Americans of the merits of ObamaCare. What we got instead were more taunts, insults and attacks from the bully pulpit, with Obama daring opponents to repeal the legislation and mocking those who believe that he pledged to uphold the US Constitution instead of wiping with it after Chris Matthews is done kissing his behind.
Matthews continues to attribute racist motives to Constitutional conservatives who oppose Obama, yet he couldn’t even feign surprise during his March 7, 2010 show when disgraced ex-journalist Dan Rather opined that Obama"Couldn’t sell watermelons if you gave him a state trooper and he lied(sic) down in traffic.”
Mr. Obama has also given interviews of late, characterizing those who oppose his policies as racist, conspiracy nuts who actually oppose him because of his skin color (which I’d like to remind you is half-white) or because (according to Obama) he wasn’t born in this country, a blatant misrepresentation of the argument made by so-called “birthers” about his eligibility. As one of those so-called birthers, I question, not whether Barack Obama was born in the US, but whether his birth, wherever that was, qualifies him as a “natural-born” US citizen, as only “natural born” citizens qualify to be president.
Not content with a few cheap shots, Obama and Democrats have now embarked on a smear campaign the likes of which we’ve never seen. Anyone who questions Obama’s motives or agenda, anyone who is associated with the Tea Party movement and anyone who disapproves of his installation of a socialist dictatorship with its “carrot and stick” approach is to be labeled as a violent racist.
Democrats seem to be operating on the premise that if you can’t silence the message, just shoot the messenger. Unfortunately for them, there are simply too many Paul Reveres this time. Too many voices to silence and too many Americans who still believe in their Constitution to allow this garbage to continue. I’m not shutting up, I’m not intimidated by a deaf congress, executive thuggery, or baseless charges of racism. I can articulate specific socialist policy decisions I disagree with and which provisions of our founding documents these policies violate. And my voice, along with millions of others, will be heard louder than ever in November. Until then, if you have any concrete evidence that my opposition to Obama’s objectionable policies is based on anything other than his Marxism, then put it out there for the world to see. Otherwise, I suggest you shut your big Fat Mouth.
Thursday, April 1, 2010
HOW CAN THEY STILL BELIEVE A PHONY LIKE HIM?
Bible according to Barry
Easter prayer:“Begone Obama”
By Judi McLeod Thursday, April 1, 2010
Morning Blackberry messages from White House faith director Joshua DuBois notwithstanding, the main religion of President Barack (aka Barry Soetoro) Obama is the Mocking of America.
Not only is the president with no past pulling the wings off the eagle called America, he seems to want us to know that he revels in it.
Two days before Easter Sunday last year, the Obamas were still looking for a church to attend.
Thanks to the British Mail online we found out early this Easter that Obama “worships with prayers sent to his trusty phone”.
“He may be too busy to go to church as often as he would like. But President Obama can always find time to check his Blackberry.”(David Gardner, Mail Online, April 1, 2010).“So when he needs a little inspiration in the mornings, Mr. Obama revealed today that all he has to do is read the daily prayer emailed to him from pastors around America.
“He said that White House faith director Joshua DuBois forwards him a morning prayer every day from a selection sent in by some of the churchmen he met during his cross-country travels on the presidential campaign.”
It’s a little like saying “I gave at the office” when charity comes to call, or “Your check is in the mail” when the bank calls about your late rent or mortgage payment.
But just as no one could ever prove that he didn’t hear the rants of Jeremiah Wright in the Trinity United Church of Christ he attended for 20 years, no one will ever know if Obama is getting that old time religion on his Blackberry.
Since his election to the White House, Obama has been mocking Americans.
Indeed it is with an almost religious fervor that Obama mocks the very people he was elected to serve—always mocking them from the safety of the sidelines.
Right after election his main retort to dissenters was:“I won”.
When worries about the transformation of America sends everyday Americans to church or sleepless nights, Obama makes sure the media shows him shooting hoops or tossing balls.
With the recent House debate raging over the health care bill on at the same time the NCAA tournament was in full swing, CBS News White House correspondent Mark Kroller asked what, exactly, the President, a college basketball fan who filled out a bracket for the second straight year was watching.
“Replied White House spokesman Robert Gibbs:“Mostly basketball.”(CBSNews.com March 21, 2010)
While mocking Americans, The Blackberry-is-my-church president is making a mockery of the office of the President of the United States of America.
Because people anywhere anytime could cite it, on Sept. 26, 2009 Canada Free Press came up with a prayer for our time:“Deliver us from Obama”.
This Easter Weekend, it could be replaced with a new one:“Begone Obama.”
Easter prayer:“Begone Obama”
By Judi McLeod Thursday, April 1, 2010
Morning Blackberry messages from White House faith director Joshua DuBois notwithstanding, the main religion of President Barack (aka Barry Soetoro) Obama is the Mocking of America.
Not only is the president with no past pulling the wings off the eagle called America, he seems to want us to know that he revels in it.
Two days before Easter Sunday last year, the Obamas were still looking for a church to attend.
Thanks to the British Mail online we found out early this Easter that Obama “worships with prayers sent to his trusty phone”.
“He may be too busy to go to church as often as he would like. But President Obama can always find time to check his Blackberry.”(David Gardner, Mail Online, April 1, 2010).“So when he needs a little inspiration in the mornings, Mr. Obama revealed today that all he has to do is read the daily prayer emailed to him from pastors around America.
“He said that White House faith director Joshua DuBois forwards him a morning prayer every day from a selection sent in by some of the churchmen he met during his cross-country travels on the presidential campaign.”
It’s a little like saying “I gave at the office” when charity comes to call, or “Your check is in the mail” when the bank calls about your late rent or mortgage payment.
But just as no one could ever prove that he didn’t hear the rants of Jeremiah Wright in the Trinity United Church of Christ he attended for 20 years, no one will ever know if Obama is getting that old time religion on his Blackberry.
Since his election to the White House, Obama has been mocking Americans.
Indeed it is with an almost religious fervor that Obama mocks the very people he was elected to serve—always mocking them from the safety of the sidelines.
Right after election his main retort to dissenters was:“I won”.
When worries about the transformation of America sends everyday Americans to church or sleepless nights, Obama makes sure the media shows him shooting hoops or tossing balls.
With the recent House debate raging over the health care bill on at the same time the NCAA tournament was in full swing, CBS News White House correspondent Mark Kroller asked what, exactly, the President, a college basketball fan who filled out a bracket for the second straight year was watching.
“Replied White House spokesman Robert Gibbs:“Mostly basketball.”(CBSNews.com March 21, 2010)
While mocking Americans, The Blackberry-is-my-church president is making a mockery of the office of the President of the United States of America.
Because people anywhere anytime could cite it, on Sept. 26, 2009 Canada Free Press came up with a prayer for our time:“Deliver us from Obama”.
This Easter Weekend, it could be replaced with a new one:“Begone Obama.”
Global warming? More like Global Corruption
Agency asserts the right to regulate carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions under the Clean Air Act
Destroying America with the EPA’s Carbon Lies
By Alan Caruba Thursday, April 1, 2010
Lisa Jackson, Obama’s EPA director, has just announced the agency’s new auto regulations of gas mileage based on global warming. In addition, the agency asserts the right to regulate carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions under the Clean Air Act.
There is NO need to limit greenhouse gas emissions because there is NO “global warming.”
There is absolutely no scientific justification for this and, indeed, many observers believe the EPA lacks the legal authority regarding its stance on CO2.
There is NO need to limit greenhouse gas emissions because there is NO “global warming.”
Greenhouse gases are purported to be the primary cause of this fraud. The EPA, like a dozen other U.S. agencies, has been pushing the global warming fraud for decades. One more lie, even a whopper about CO2, is of little concern to the EPA at this point.
Beyond the issue of scientific fraud, there are the scientific facts that demonstrate that CO2 plays a miniscule role, if any, as regards the Earth’s climate. Carbon dioxide is less than one percent of the Earth’s atmosphere (386 parts per million).
There is, in fact, no greenhouse effect. The most active element of the atmosphere is the 95% of water vapor that forms a protective layer around the Earth.
The science involved is fairly simple. Clouds have a warming effect because, in order for water vapor to condense back into water droplets, the water molecules must first re-emit the energy they absorbed to become vapor. That latent heat causes the local environment to feel warmer. It is this constant interchange that determines whether wherever you’re at right now is warmer or cooler.
The public is rarely, if ever, told that meteorologists have NO idea why clouds act as they do. All they can do is track cloud activity via satellite images, but they can only accurately predict the weather at best for three to four days ahead. This is why, when you watch a televised weather forecast, they mostly just point to cloud systems.
The Earth’s oceans contain fifty times the CO2 in the Earth’s atmosphere. The Earth’s biomass, oceans, near-surface rocks and soils contain 100,000 times the carbon in the atmosphere.
How can carbon dioxide be a pollutant when all life on Earth is dependent upon it?
To declare CO2 toxic, the EPA is saying that all that natural CO2, plus the six pounds of carbon dioxide that every human exhale every day is a “pollutant.”
How can carbon dioxide be a pollutant when all life on Earth is dependent upon it?
CO2 is to vegetation what oxygen is to human and other animal life. Without CO2, all vegetation dies and then all animal life dies for lack of the nutrients provided by food crops.
The EPA will blame the generation of CO2 on energy use, but 97% of the Earth’s CO2 is produced by Nature!
Only about 3% of all the CO2 in the atmosphere is produced by humans via industrial and transport activity. This estimate, in fact, comes from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change! The IPCC’s other alleged climate data is subject to serious challenge, but this is not. It falls into the category of common knowledge among climate scientists.
Environmentalists are insanely opposed to all energy use with the exception of bicycles, canoes, and walking. They particularly hate automobiles, but these are the same people, along with the EPA, that have insisted on the inclusion of ethanol, otherwise known as moonshine, in every gallon of gasoline. The immediate result is less mileage per gallon and the production of more CO2!
None of these facts is a secret yet, since 1989, the U.S. government has spent $79 billion in taxpayer’s money on “climate change” research. To suggest that the government, using the data generated, has any “control” over the climate is absurd.
The result of all that government funded research has been a public that has been subjected to the massive fraud called global warming. Weather data provided by NASA and NOAA, for example, has had to have been withdrawn due to errors.
Not only has the scientific community learned that the IPCC data was manipulated and that efforts were made to suppress data refuting global warming, but the Earth has irrefutably been in a cooling cycle for over a decade at this point.
The EPA regulatory control of auto mileage and CO2 emissions is a complete fraud and a contemptible lie. In doing so it has become a gangster agency that has abandoned any credibility.
Finally, the Cap-and-Trade Act awaiting a vote in the Senate is based on the global warming fraud and, if enacted, would impose massive taxation on all energy use. It must be stopped.
The EPA’s latest move must be stopped.
The fate of the nation’s economy literally depends on this.
© Alan C
Destroying America with the EPA’s Carbon Lies
By Alan Caruba Thursday, April 1, 2010
Lisa Jackson, Obama’s EPA director, has just announced the agency’s new auto regulations of gas mileage based on global warming. In addition, the agency asserts the right to regulate carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions under the Clean Air Act.
There is NO need to limit greenhouse gas emissions because there is NO “global warming.”
There is absolutely no scientific justification for this and, indeed, many observers believe the EPA lacks the legal authority regarding its stance on CO2.
There is NO need to limit greenhouse gas emissions because there is NO “global warming.”
Greenhouse gases are purported to be the primary cause of this fraud. The EPA, like a dozen other U.S. agencies, has been pushing the global warming fraud for decades. One more lie, even a whopper about CO2, is of little concern to the EPA at this point.
Beyond the issue of scientific fraud, there are the scientific facts that demonstrate that CO2 plays a miniscule role, if any, as regards the Earth’s climate. Carbon dioxide is less than one percent of the Earth’s atmosphere (386 parts per million).
There is, in fact, no greenhouse effect. The most active element of the atmosphere is the 95% of water vapor that forms a protective layer around the Earth.
The science involved is fairly simple. Clouds have a warming effect because, in order for water vapor to condense back into water droplets, the water molecules must first re-emit the energy they absorbed to become vapor. That latent heat causes the local environment to feel warmer. It is this constant interchange that determines whether wherever you’re at right now is warmer or cooler.
The public is rarely, if ever, told that meteorologists have NO idea why clouds act as they do. All they can do is track cloud activity via satellite images, but they can only accurately predict the weather at best for three to four days ahead. This is why, when you watch a televised weather forecast, they mostly just point to cloud systems.
The Earth’s oceans contain fifty times the CO2 in the Earth’s atmosphere. The Earth’s biomass, oceans, near-surface rocks and soils contain 100,000 times the carbon in the atmosphere.
How can carbon dioxide be a pollutant when all life on Earth is dependent upon it?
To declare CO2 toxic, the EPA is saying that all that natural CO2, plus the six pounds of carbon dioxide that every human exhale every day is a “pollutant.”
How can carbon dioxide be a pollutant when all life on Earth is dependent upon it?
CO2 is to vegetation what oxygen is to human and other animal life. Without CO2, all vegetation dies and then all animal life dies for lack of the nutrients provided by food crops.
The EPA will blame the generation of CO2 on energy use, but 97% of the Earth’s CO2 is produced by Nature!
Only about 3% of all the CO2 in the atmosphere is produced by humans via industrial and transport activity. This estimate, in fact, comes from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change! The IPCC’s other alleged climate data is subject to serious challenge, but this is not. It falls into the category of common knowledge among climate scientists.
Environmentalists are insanely opposed to all energy use with the exception of bicycles, canoes, and walking. They particularly hate automobiles, but these are the same people, along with the EPA, that have insisted on the inclusion of ethanol, otherwise known as moonshine, in every gallon of gasoline. The immediate result is less mileage per gallon and the production of more CO2!
None of these facts is a secret yet, since 1989, the U.S. government has spent $79 billion in taxpayer’s money on “climate change” research. To suggest that the government, using the data generated, has any “control” over the climate is absurd.
The result of all that government funded research has been a public that has been subjected to the massive fraud called global warming. Weather data provided by NASA and NOAA, for example, has had to have been withdrawn due to errors.
Not only has the scientific community learned that the IPCC data was manipulated and that efforts were made to suppress data refuting global warming, but the Earth has irrefutably been in a cooling cycle for over a decade at this point.
The EPA regulatory control of auto mileage and CO2 emissions is a complete fraud and a contemptible lie. In doing so it has become a gangster agency that has abandoned any credibility.
Finally, the Cap-and-Trade Act awaiting a vote in the Senate is based on the global warming fraud and, if enacted, would impose massive taxation on all energy use. It must be stopped.
The EPA’s latest move must be stopped.
The fate of the nation’s economy literally depends on this.
© Alan C
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)